Token volume is real and growing.
On 2025 figures, usage runs ~7.5× ahead of the cash it generates. This ledger tracks the gap between what's used and what's paid, and whether it's closing.
List-priced notional usage vs customer-paid revenue, 2025 · not revenueToken volume is real and growing.
At list price, usage would be much larger than realised revenue.
The share of tokens paid for. The rest is free tiers, bundles, discounts and internal use.
Total tokens processed per day, by quarter. Inference token volume grew +221% year-on-year in 2025, and the trend points toward roughly 620T/day by the end of 2026. That is the clearest evidence demand is real.
Demand traces to named companies running production workloads. The full per-company table is in the detail section below.
Share of all tokens against share of AI revenue. A few labs capture most of the cash on a small slice of the volume. The rest of the tokens earn little or nothing as AI sales.
Each pocket of AI revenue, by who pays and how they buy. Colour = how directly that revenue moves with token usage. Green is metered (rises and falls with tokens), red is bundled into seats or subscriptions (shielded from token prices). Two reads:
List prices for a given model have collapsed — but as usage shifts to newer premium and reasoning models, the average price actually paid per token has barely fallen.
ARR vs collected: revenue figures on this page are provider ARR (trailing-quarter run-rate × 4). The Overview shows $24B of customer-paid AI revenue (2025, gross). ARR and customer-paid revenue measure different things. See Methodology and the Revenue Ledger.
Projections are directional arithmetic, not forecasts. Benchmarks are dated and sourced. Token volumes default to a multi-model consensus across fourteen providers; every assumption is editable. Where a number appears on a Ledger page, that page is the canonical source. Full method on the Methodology page.